Raphael Pulgar. An audio engineer of 20 years who specializes in rock and metal recordings, he also plays guitar and produces original music for his band and other content creators. These are great for beginners and are also affordable options for those who want to expand their home recording without spending too much.
Users experienced low roundtrip latencies compared to their older interfaces with some going as low as 5ms without jitter or dropouts. The level meters were also praised for visibility and accuracy and helped users get the right amount of input gain faster. Some experienced power issues when connecting via USB. The MOTU M4 is an audio interface with top-tier tech and refinements packaged in a more affordable and compact format.
Get it if you value pristine audio and don't need much in terms of inputs. For solo artists, voice recordings, and other small projects, the MOTU M4 shines above many similarly priced offerings. Focusrite has an interface for every need. From the minimal Focusrite Solo to the Scarlett 18i Each preamp has an additional "Air" setting that brings in an upper midrange lift similar to their famed ISA series preamps.
For the 3rd gen, Focusrite improved the gain range on their preamps to drive dynamic mics better. Many of the reviewers were first-time purchasers of recording interfaces and they loved the preamps on the 4i4.
This was a feature added to the current generation of interfaces from Focusrite, including the 4i4. Many users appreciated the inclusion of this feature previously seen on their more expensive Clarett series interfaces on the Scarlett 4i4.
Some experienced intermittent connection and dropouts. Comments in response speculate it might be because of buffer sizes and computer spec limitations. The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 is a mid-entry powerhouse with features carried over from their upper tier Clarett line. Unlike other interfaces at this tier, the XMAX preamps were designed to be pushed for more richness and depth.
A bright LED meter ensures you set your gain at the optimum levels for any instrument or vocal to help you tread the line between sweet saturation and harsh clipping. More than just marketing, users are quick to notice the difference the XMAX preamps provide even with their raw tracks. Many noticed a level or richness at higher gain settings that are similar to how analog consoles tend to drive. Cymbals and other instruments with high-frequency content did not sound brittle or harsh.
While the saturation may be a plus for some, others found that the preamps tend to color the sound a bit too much for their taste. If you want a compact audio interface that adds just a little bit of large studio vibe and mojo to your tracks, then the Presonus Studio 68c is a great pick.
This type of interface offers 4 built-in channels plus the capability of increasing inputs with an additional preamp unit. That's Audient's tagline for the iD Many satisfied users call it a "Game Changer" with its multitude of features that are more often seen in large format consoles. It also drives bigger headphones easily with no separate headphone amp needed to push higher. RME's follow up to their popular Babyface interface features upgraded components over its predecessor.
This includes better clocking for syncing up with additional external preamps and sources. The headphone amplification was also improved to drive higher impedance headphones with lower noise and distortion. Long-term expandability was one of the most commonly repeated plus of the Babyface Pro FS.
The mixer app felt clunky to use for a few users. The fact that phantom power is controlled only via the app was also seen as a negative. In an already crowded market of compact interfaces, the RME Babyface Pro FS stands out as one that can do both mobile and centerpiece positions in a studio.
Most interfaces in this range still have compact enclosures and USB Bus power. Reviewers that use the 8i6 are home producers with external gear that doesn't need a lot of inputs. Several positive reviews note that given the price and functionality, there is no need to make the jump to the next interface in the lineup. Routing software is clunky. The 8i6 also is the most niche product in the lineup since it barely adds anything to the 4i4 but loses to the 18i8 in terms of features.
The middle ground isn't always the best compromise. Get it if this is you. If not, it only takes a bit more to get the 18i8.
Drawing from their mother company's Yamaha hardware manufacturing expertise, Steinberg's audio interfaces have become quite the market favorite. This makes the UR44 a versatile interface that can handle both home and mobile recordings. As expected, this interface integrates well with Steinberg software, but it can also be used with other DAWs.
Many reviewers report that reliability, software compatibility, and audio quality are the best traits of this compact USB audio interface.
Most are impressed with its solid construction and low-latency operation, especially when used with Cubase DAW software. The built-in reverb, channel strip, and the bundled mixing app also get a lot of thumbs up. Some wished for a digital output for easy expansion, but this is a reasonable limitation given the price.
Finally, there were a few who complained about the initial setup being more complicated than what they are used to, but they still appreciated its overall performance. If you're using Steinberg's Cubase then you should take advantage of the extra mileage that you can get out of the UR When you're planning on recording over four sound sources simultaneously, like when miking an acoustic drum kit, a singing group, or a band - you'll need a capable audio interface with more inputs.
The 18i8 represents the first real jump in terms of inputs for the Focusrite Scarlett 3rd Gen range. This makes it perfect for having a mobile interface that you can connect at home to maximize the full input range or on the road if you want to take your recording ability anywhere. Mobility is the name of the game for some and the 18i8 has a dedicated fanbase of users that prefer the best of both worlds: Being able to travel with a compact interface and being able to expand the inputs at home or in the studio.
Some compromises have to be made to fit the price bracket such as only having ADAT in but no output. The 18i8 is in a more broad segment in the Focusrite range. It has the expandability of a full audio interface while remaining as compact as possible for road use. It doesn't have all the inputs of the 18i20 but is a definite step up from the 8i6. The 18i20 is the flagship of the Scarlett range. The 18i20 is the centerpiece of many users' recording studios.
They chose this interface for the number of mic preamps available on the unit itself and when combined with additional preamps like the Focusrite Scarlett Octopre , has more than enough to record a full band and more.
Many users say this is their first "serious" audio interface with good reason: the 18i20 makes sure you're ready to handle bigger sessions. Clunky routing software. Some problems with the drivers on early units that are resolved by updating. The 3rd Gen 18i20 brings a lot to the table.
Sure, other interfaces offer the same amount of preamps but what sets the Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 apart is time-tested reliability and quality. With the new generation having better gain handling and the new "Air" feature trickled down from Focusrite's ISA series preamps, the 3rd Gen 18i20 is a sure winner. It has 8 analog inputs, including two combo XLRs, while also providing more than a handful of output options. But it's not just about connectivity, because this unit comes with RME's Hammerfall converters, known for their premium sound quality.
Reviews are flooded with superlatives like excellent, great, superior - all of which are reflected in the RME Fireface UCX's high ratings. Everything from sound quality, to its solid build, to its reliability got a lot of positive mentions. One user even reported having no problems and not a single instance of software crashing with his almost two years of use. Even Sam Inglis of Sound on Sound is convinced of its performance, saying "the main reasons for buying a Fireface UCX remain its excellent sound and performance".
There are a few who noted that the interface has some room for improvement, other than that, everyone seems thrilled with their expensive interface. If budget is not an issue, and you're looking for a powerful and versatile audio interface, then the RME Fireface UCX is highly recommended.
Nevertheless, it is often a good idea to invest in an interface with multiple inputs early on if you plan on recording several sources at once even before you upgrade.
Studio Capture is the flagship model of Roland's line of audio interfaces, and as expected, this one carries all the big guns, meant for professional studio use.
Experts appreciate the generous input and output options that this unit provides, and after putting their units to the test with maxed input and output options, they found that the Roland Studio Capture passed with flying colors. Reviews and comments point to its sound quality, solid and reliable build, and easy operation - and these are from people who use different DAW software and operating systems, from those with Cubase on Windows to Pro Tools on Macs.
Others liked how relatively portable it is despite being a full-sized audio interface. If you're looking for a reliable audio interface with 16 analog inputs that you fits just as well in a large studio, desktop or even an impromptu recording session, then get the top-rated Roland Studio Capture.
The Fireface packs RME's premium build and sound quality into an audio interface with 12 analog inputs. Users applaud the Fireface , calling it "fantastic" and "wonderful". Clarity and overall sound quality receive the most praise, while others are thrilled with its versatility and connectivity.
Many of the users report that it works well on Macs, but there are also Windows users who are just as impressed. One user described the sound as clear and uncolored, ideal for those who want transparent recordings of instruments and vocals. There were a few who wish for added features like, extra XLR combo inputs, while some were not too happy with how the manual describes its operation. But aside from that: Vocals are usually one microphone input used at a time for single voice recording.
Sometimes you might want two in order to get a couple singers tracked at once or to get a stereo recording of a group of singers. So that's a realistic, estimated minimum of two mic inputs needed for the vocals in your case. Guitar can vary depending on how you're recording you might be talking about tracking electric guitar direct in or a combination of direct in and two mics on a speaker cab, which would be three inputs total but two mic inputs is usually good enough for most cases and that includes the stereo tracking of acoustic guitar.
MIDI input is not always included on interfaces, but so long as you buy one with that capability there you'll have it. As far as outputs are concerned, you'll need at least two to carry the left and right stereo signals of your monitor output to your monitors. You'll also probably at least want a single headphone output so you can use headphones to track with, when the need arises.
Its cool to have extra channels to expand in the future and also to have more things pluged in. I have an 8 channel and only use 4 at one time.
Do uche bags. If he was simply making the point he would have flat out said you need more information.. Im sure you guys were once new at this and asked questions Its like people on here have egos because they sit on a forum all day and know more than someone else.. He's forgotten more then you'll ever learn. It does need to have good audio quality recording capabilities. Any suggestions? Presonus Quantum maybe?
My Studio. Had them for 2 years now, was very happy with it - rockstable drivers on MacOs and Windows. Will go for an X32 now, as 16 ins are not enough anymore. Behringer xr18 fits the bill perfectly. Behringer ufx. Thnx for your suggestions. How are the behringers in terms of sound quality?
And latency? Have you considered the Soundcraft UI24r? Version 3 update has also added new features including the ability to link two units together.
Worth a look. You then get the top notch RME drivers. I read that some users have problems with latency with the XR It will have to function as my main interface for my DAW as well, so playing softsynths etc should work with very low latency. And what about sound quality? Is it studio grade quality? I see it only samples at 48 kHz? And I will be maxed out in inputs immediately.
0コメント